Saturday, May 30, 2009

.

.

"Dish Network":

I keep seeing the same commercial for many months about Dish Network. Sometimes Dish Network has a few different commercials. They claim to have more affordable programming.

Do they?

It depends on what types of programming that you like to watch. DirecTV, Dish Network's competitor, offers different channels for different prices.

Dish Network has offered programming for less than $10.00 USD !!
To clarify this, they only offer this lowered amount of payment for a few months.

And let's look at all the mail that people get from these services. They also provide ads in the newspapers and the magazines. Do that and you can easily compare the programming offered.

Dish Network has "America's Top 100", and "America's Top 200", etc. I think this is Dish Network's opinions, not America's. FOX News Channel is offered on "America's Top 200", the second level of programming, not the first level like DirecTV advertises. If you count that the majority of America voted for Barack Obama, then FOX News Channel would literally fall into "America's Top 200".

Fox News is a news coverage that "asks questions". They ask all kinds of questions to anybody, even if the questions are unpopular to ask. I myself have watched news coverage in 2008 and know that many news sources such as CBS and NBC are very repetitive and quickly and conveniently gloss over any of Barack Obama's controversies. CBS News's Katie Couric interviewed "Joe The Plumber" a person who has the modified nickname of "Average Joe", and Joe The Plumber has had plans to begin his own business. To be fair, He was only an employee and did not have a license to do this. He could have gotten one. The point of him wanting to start a business is to express that an Obama administration would make things difficult for businesses. Joe The Plumber could not finish because Katie Couric said they were out of time and then said that they would still have a Live Broadcast on the web. It is interesting that he got to say what he thinks of a McCain administration and right when he mentions Obama's name, he is interrupted by Katie Couric.

Also Fox News has very limited programming for its stations in favor of a 24 hour network that must have a cable or satellite subscription service. SOME of the FOX stations have extensive local news coverage as a substitute. Unfortunately, FOX News has had lower ratings when compared with other stations that provide more national news on their stations, because

FOX News still has limited availability.

And Dish Network has FOX News Channel, the best place to find FOX News, on America's Top 200. This makes FOX News Channel have less availability than the other Cable/Satellite news stations!! MSNBC has NBC, which means that NBC News is widely available at all times and in all areas. CNN has several networks, none of which is available over the air. It does have a Live Stream online. CNN is offered on America's Top 100. This means that FOX News has limited availability even compared to CNN!!

With Dish Network, people thinking that they are paying more, are actually getting less, not the SAME service as DirecTV. And if they want to see FOX News more, then they will have to PAY MORE.

I wonder what other channels on Dish Network can be found for less each month with DirecTV.

Not Done Yet:

PENDING.

Not Done Yet.

Pending...

Monday, May 18, 2009

ACLU:

Because Freedom Can't Protect Itself.

and neither can the ACLU!!

I have a ban FOR EVER on campus housing. I cannot apply for work there, or apply to reside there. I do not want to do that, nor do I want to attend college anymore. I still do not want to have these false accusations on my permanent academic record. I also have "temporary" bans on the rest of the campus and for enrollment.

I still think that part of what happened to me were a political reasons, one agenda was to make sure I was homeless. If I wanted to appeal, and this is of course being forced off campus, then I have to have a working telephone number. I did not. Another reason that I am banned is because I was set up. That "masked" person must have framed me, and I of course do not have any proof. They do not have proof either, but the administrators do have the power of tyranny. They can decide what punishments to use on whoever they want to, for whatever they did or did not do. This is wrong, and a much better and actual discipline policy should be started. Doesn't this sound like something that would interest the ACLU? Don't they have priority to represent cases that can also help others as a result?

I guess not.

I never was interested in the ACLU to send my complaint, because they do not have email. They also do not have a telephone number, and instead, a menu, and eventually an automated message saying... to leave a message.

Because they have limited staff and are unable to answer calls.

So they might as well not even have the phone number.

Ruling that out, all that is left is regular mail. The type that has rising postage costs and the possibility of a shortened delivery week. The risks of the mail getting lost. The SLOWEST way to deliver things, unless you want to deliver things to them in person and travel on foot for example.

16 months later, I immediately sent my complaint to the ACLU. I mailed it to them a few months ago. One reason I loathed mailing is because at the time I did not have a printer, up to date software, etc. I do now, but since I did not then, I neatly wrote them what happened. A lot happened, so it took a few pages. I also thought since they think email is unsecure, that my handwriting a letter would make them think that the message is more secure and more genuine. It does not matter because I could care less what they think. I think that their shunning of email addresses and online forms is just terrible. I picked OCR because of their online form, and because it makes sense to notify OCR, because it is with the U.S. Department of EDUCATION, which manages EDUCATIONal facilities. If you can see the word EDUCATION in both of those phrases, then you can easily see that it makes sense to notify OCR. OCR has VERY limited categories of discrimination. ACLU does not. It has MUCH more categories, which includes Due Process, and Student Rights And Academic Freedom.

Well!!

The Student Rights And Academic Freedom category is very obvious. Surely ACLU can help... I will click on "Get Help".

There is a form to PRINT, not send. I asked a friend to print it for me, and I included a copy of the terrible letter the university gave to me, and my detailed hand written attachment.

I sent it in the regular mail because I could not send it online, with email, or by calling their phone.

I mailed it and still have not received a response. I called their automated number and still nothing.

And I didn't get any help.

I also called another Human Rights organization. They called back and they just said "get a lawyer" "start looking down the yellow pages".

These organizations must be just as corrupt as the facilities that are cruel to people.

So to review this very bad organization, it is unfortunate that nobody wants to help me. It is unfortunate that it is so easy to discriminate against somebody and so difficult for the victims to defend themselves. It is also ridiculous to have filing limitations and even worse to not have online forms and email. And even a limited telephone line!! If you want ACLU to help, perhaps you should consider what happened to me and that the ACLU did not even answer my complaint.

Because Freedom Can't Protect Itself.

and neither can the ACLU!!

I have a ban FOR EVER on campus housing. I cannot apply for work there, or apply to reside there. I do not want to do that, nor do I want to attend college anymore. I still do not want to have these false accusations on my permanent academic record. I also have "temporary" bans on the rest of the campus and for enrollment.

I still think that part of what happened to me were a political reasons, one agenda was to make sure I was homeless. If I wanted to appeal, and this is of course being forced off campus, then I have to have a working telephone number. I did not. Another reason that I am banned is because I was set up. That "masked" person must have framed me, and I of course do not have any proof. They do not have proof either, but the administrators do have the power of tyranny. They can decide what punishments to use on whoever they want to, for whatever they did or did not do. This is wrong, and a much better and actual discipline policy should be started. Doesn't this sound like something that would interest the ACLU? Don't they have priority to represent cases that can also help others as a result?

I guess not.

I never was interested in the ACLU to send my complaint, because they do not have email. They also do not have a telephone number, and instead, a menu, and eventually an automated message saying... to leave a message.

Because they have limited staff and are unable to answer calls.

So they might as well not even have the phone number.

Ruling that out, all that is left is regular mail. The type that has rising postage costs and the possibility of a shortened delivery week. The risks of the mail getting lost. The SLOWEST way to deliver things, unless you want to deliver things to them in person and travel on foot for example.

16 months later, I immediately sent my complaint to the ACLU. I mailed it to them a few months ago. One reason I loathed mailing is because at the time I did not have a printer, up to date software, etc. I do now, but since I did not then, I neatly wrote them what happened. A lot happened, so it took a few pages. I also thought since they think email is unsecure, that my handwriting a letter would make them think that the message is more secure and more genuine. It does not matter because I could care less what they think. I think that their shunning of email addresses and online forms is just terrible. I picked OCR because of their online form, and because it makes sense to notify OCR, because it is with the U.S. Department of EDUCATION, which manages EDUCATIONal facilities. If you can see the word EDUCATION in both of those phrases, then you can easily see that it makes sense to notify OCR. OCR has VERY limited categories of discrimination. ACLU does not. It has MUCH more categories, which includes Due Process, and Student Rights And Academic Freedom.

Well!!

The Student Rights And Academic Freedom category is very obvious. Surely ACLU can help... I will click on "Get Help".

There is a form to PRINT, not send. I asked a friend to print it for me, and I included a copy of the terrible letter the university gave to me, and my detailed hand written attachment.

I sent it in the regular mail because I could not send it online, with email, or by calling their phone.

I mailed it and still have not received a response. I called their automated number and still nothing.

And I didn't get any help.

I also called another Human Rights organization. They called back and they just said "get a lawyer" "start looking down the yellow pages".

These organizations must be just as corrupt as the facilities that are cruel to people.

So to review this very bad organization, it is unfortunate that nobody wants to help me. It is unfortunate that it is so easy to discriminate against somebody and so difficult for the victims to defend themselves. It is also ridiculous to have filing limitations and even worse to not have online forms and email. And even a limited telephone line!! If you want ACLU to help, perhaps you should consider what happened to me and that the ACLU did not even answer my complaint.

OCR:

I am writing a review about the OCR.

OCR stands for Office for Civil Rights.

And mine were violated when right before I was supposed to attend college. It happened all summer and even before that. I have false accusations on my permanent academic record and a permanent ban on campus housing. I have temporary bans on enrollment and "trespassing" on campus.

And because of that, I have decided to NEVER enroll anyplace and the place that banned me is the last place I will enroll, despite their "temporary" ban on enrollment. I do not want to enroll there EVER because of what the administrators did to me, and I don't want to enroll anyplace else because OCR is with the U.S. Department Of Education because of what OCR did to me.

What all did OCR do?

They have an online form to send, so I sent it. It was almost "too late" also. But I sent it because I refuse to believe that when people are cruel to others in any way, the victims must be forced to accept it. Having a limit to file complaints is ridiculous. They also have limited categories.

This means that OCR is responsible for enforcing certain laws for educational facilities that receive specific government funding.

And if, in other words, a facility did not violate a contract, then there is nothing that can be done by OCR.

They did open two complaints, quickly closed one because of claiming they did not have authority to investigate, and 16 months of stalling before closing the other investigation. I am sure that the educational facility that I "alleged" what happened to me did quite a bit of the stalling. I am very shocked that after a few more months of stalling, OCR concluded that even when they had 4 attorneys and several teams of investigators look over the file, which they said was enormous (which I believe), when the Facility's responses and actual basis for banning me are all full of holes,

there weren't any contracts violated. OCR only seems to care about government funding contracts, and not Human Rights And Civil Liberties. And when you look at that way, nothing was done wrong in that area because Facility does not have a specific discipline policy and what punishments to place, which I have called the power of tyranny.

If OCR does not have authority, then who does?! I bet whoever has authority, also has filing limits.

I am disappointed with OCR.

I am also disappointed with the entire department of education, because they must approve of people's rights being violated if all they have is the limited OCR.

Schools that are cruel to ANYBODY should be closed, because schools should not have to be cruel and violate people's rights. They should do more than watch those that are too young to watch themselves and keep watching them until they are old enough to work. They should not make students believe that not attending college is an unpopular choice. They should teach students everything, make sure the students do not cheat, make sure the students understand and learn, and to make students behave so none of the other students are bothered and distracted, and they should teach other morals and ethics.

I guess nobody cares about morals, ethics, and education...especially The U.S. Department Of Education since they do not seem to care about what happened to me, and I bet others also. If they did, they would have a complaint and investigation system better than OCR..

...which is not literally about Civil Rights and the violations of rights,
It is about whether or not contracts have been violated that involve government funding.

Under Construction uyfg567:

....